The Effect of the Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) Method on the Value of Professional Ethics as a Result of the Internship Program at SEAMEO RECFON
| Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
The Effect of the Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) Method on the Value of Professional Ethics as a Result of the Internship Program at SEAMEO RECFON
Authors
Dodi Suswandi
SEAMEO RECFON Southeast Asia Nutrition Research Center PKGR UI
Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) Method, Professional Ethics Value, Internship Program at SEAMEO RECFON
Abstract
This study aims to determine how much influence the learning of the internship program with the Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) Method has on the Professional Ethics Value of the Internship Program at SEAMEO RECFON. The research method used in this research is Pre- Experimental Design using the One-Shot Case Study Design type. The sample used in this study were students of the Internship Program and Certified Independent Study (MSIB) Batch 6, totaling 30 Internship Participants. In this study, the average (mean) of the results of the participant activity observation sheet was 79% with the criteria “Very Good”, this shows that students play an active role in participating in the internship program with the Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) method. As for the learning outcomes of students, the average (mean) of the results of professional ethics scores was 80 with the criteria “Excellent”, this shows that the students' internship program is in excellent criteria after getting treatment (treatment) in the form of the Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) Method. Based on the results of the calculation of research data, it can be concluded that there is an influence caused by learning an apprenticeship program with the Leaderless Group Discussion (LGD) Method on the Professional Ethics Value of the results of apprentices by 14.9%.
Failed to locate the main schema resource at 'https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd'.
Invalid XML:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<doi_batch xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xmlns:ai="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" version="4.3.6" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.6 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref4.3.6.xsd">
<head>
<doi_batch_id>_1749811127</doi_batch_id>
<timestamp>1749811127</timestamp>
<depositor>
<depositor_name>Rani Santika</depositor_name>
<email_address>ijoulabs@internationaljournal.com</email_address>
</depositor>
<registrant>International Journal Labs</registrant>
</head>
<body>
<journal>
<journal_metadata>
<full_title>Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development</full_title>
<abbrev_title>Enrichment</abbrev_title>
<issn media_type="electronic">2987-3398</issn>
</journal_metadata>
<journal_issue>
<publication_date media_type="online">
<month>05</month>
<day>30</day>
<year>2025</year>
</publication_date>
<journal_volume>
<volume>3</volume>
</journal_volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.55324/enrichment.v3i2</doi>
<resource>http://journalenrichment.com/index.php/jr/issue/view/26</resource>
</doi_data>
</journal_issue>
<journal_article xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" publication_type="full_text" metadata_distribution_opts="any">
<titles>
<title>Social Media in Supreme Audit Institution: Systematic Literature Review with a Narrative Approach</title>
</titles>
<contributors>
<person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="first" language="en">
<given_name>Prihandana Aditiyando</given_name>
<surname>Suprapto</surname>
</person_name>
<person_name contributor_role="author" sequence="additional" language="en">
<given_name>Ixora Lundia </given_name>
<surname>Suwaryono</surname>
</person_name>
</contributors>
<jats:abstract xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1">
<jats:p>This paper conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) to examine how Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) have integrated social media as a means to promote transparency, accountability, and public engagement. Based on an analysis of twenty two scholarly publications released between 2008 and 2024, the study highlights patterns in the adoption and application of social media platforms particularly on Twitter and Facebook within the context of government audits. Findings indicate that although SAIs increasingly utilize these platforms to disseminate information and enhance public outreach, their communication strategies often fall short of fostering meaningful, interactive engagement with citizens. Common obstacles include institutional conservatism, limited resources, and the complexity of audit language, all of which hinder broader participation. Nonetheless, the literature identifies emerging best practices that demonstrate how strategic use of social media can move beyond passive information sharing to support dialogue, responsiveness, and collaborative oversight. The review concludes that social media holds considerable yet largely untapped potential to strengthen SAIs’ democratic function. Realizing this potential will require not only technological adaptation but also organizational shifts toward more open, participatory governance models.</jats:p>
</jats:abstract>
<publication_date media_type="online">
<month>06</month>
<day>05</day>
<year>2025</year>
</publication_date>
<doi_data>
<doi>10.55324/enrichment.v3i2.380</doi>
<resource>http://journalenrichment.com/index.php/jr/article/view/380</resource>
<collection property="crawler-based"/>
<collection property="text-mining"/>
</doi_data>
</journal_article>
</journal>
</body>
</doi_batch>
This work is licensed under a 